The Famous Lone Gunman™ Strikes Again!

Second post for Sunday

A rule of thumb for history is to never discount the first reports to come out of any situation. They are usually the correct ones. What comes up later is the official spin and cover up of inconvenient truth.

The original reports from Ft Hood said there were about 3 shooters. This was according to eye witness accounts. Now, it's one lone gunman , like always, because more than one shooter makes this a whole other deal and America doesn't want to hear that.

Remember that a similar plot to shoot up an Army base was foiled at Ft Dix in New Jersey. Hot Air reported from CNN that "One gunman “neutralized,” one “cornered,” no word on the third." and "Whether there are two shooters or three seems to be in dispute at the moment, but there’s certainly more than one: The second shooting on the base evidently occurred at a theater."

again:
"According to MSNBC, there were three shooters. One is dead, two more are in custody. Has there ever been a case of “battle stress” that involved a conspiracy by multiple people?"

"Hearing rumblings on Twitter right now that Perry was wrong and that the two other “suspects” have now been released. Was Hasan, in fact, a lone gunman? If so, how’d those four SWAT members end up wounded? Surely he didn’t surprise them all after they arrived on the scene."

From KCEN-TV: " reports that a third shooter is firing on a SWAT Team..." At least four local SWAT officers were among those wounded, KCEN reported"

Now, its a lone gunman. Lone Gunman should be a US trademarked™ title. We seem to get a lot of them.