President Obama's unilateral DREAM decision puts him in the position of breaking the law of the land.
As he swore to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States, he has now broken that sworn oath. Should he be fired?
Of course he swore to nothing at his inauguration, so, perhaps that was his work around on that.
His unilateral decree gives amnesty not only to those who were brought to the USA illegally by parents, but to those older teens and twenty somethings who traipsed across the border all on their own.
Is he pulling a Caesar like empire move? We are a Republic. Rome was too until Caesar grabbed power.
While people want to be kind and compassionate to the stranger, it is not always possible when your own citizens are wounded and hurt by it. And unbridled illegal immigration hurts the nation.
What you think of as an act of kindness turns out to be a cruelty.
What about Marco Rubio the Republican? Some want him as vice president for Mitt Romney. He has his own plans for amnesty just like Obama.
All the candidates have bleeding hearts for the wrong things, the wrong ideals. Where is the compassion on the USA and the rising crime rates from illegal activity, the loss of jobs, etc.? Where is the compassion for those who come here legally each year?
Where are demands to clean up the situations that are destroying the Mexican people and their nation? Where is the moral outrage over the murders occurring in Mexico daily?
If the US should intervene to help anywhere it should be for those nations on our own doorstep! Our own neighbors for goodness sake.
But there is no compassion for them. And, as Hillary Clinton said, there is too much money to be made in drugs to bother really. This is the awful mind set of our leaders.
No one seems to care about upholding law anymore not even Congress.
Whoever is put in office it seems that the outcome will be the same as it is the big money robber barons who finance both sides of this mess and expect a return on their investment.
Romney is Mormon , Rubio is Catholic. Both of these religions want free immigration as it means more numbers for their ranks. The two religions are backers of amnesty and what they call sanctuary cities.
When you allow illegal and unbridled immigration the character of a nation changes necessarily. Therefore all nations have policies that restrict the number of immigrants that flow into their borders each year.
The change of character and ideals can be seen in Europe where many Western European nations have changing populations.
A complete change of people in ancient Rome/Italy is what brought down the Empire.
By the time of the destruction of the second temple in Israel few Latins were left. The slaves and freedmen had taken over and changed the moral and political goals of Rome. It was not Romans who took down Jerusalem . They were pretty well gone by then. It was the mind set of Babylon that took down Jerusalem.
When Juvenal calls them "Greeks" he is using a term by which they had become known, but they were no longer Greek either. It was Babylonian now. Nations had simply shifted westward!
Tacitus tells us that by Nero's time, most of the knights and senators of Rome were the descendants of slaves, the native Roman-Latin population having dwindled down to an insignificant minority eager to leave the country. Tacitus informs us that 90% of the population were 'oriental' meaning Babylonian and Syrian,etc.
Juvenal said the same things. They were not exaggerating. Things were bad and the character and mind set of Rome was not what it once had been. Rome was sinking into a morass of filth and degeneration that would become horrific as time went by. The morals of Babylon were the lowest of their day!
Juvenal's famous line about the "Orontes flowing into the Tiber" was literal.
The Orontes was a Syrian river, and the oriental Babylonians who had moved into Syria had indeed flowed westward into Italy and now Italy had become Babylon.
And this is how nations change and their character changes. Now it is important to note that the character of a nation takes on the major mind set of the people who are in the majority.
In the end the character of the United States is being changed. Ask your elders if the US is anything like it was when they were a child. They will tell you no.
Che sera , sera
for more information see my article about changes in nations in ancient times.
In the end the character of the United States is being changed. ..